great sword for the price
I picked one of these up recently as the deal of the day at a very reasonable price. I was looking for something close to a 11th century Norman sword due to having ancestors that moved to England from France in 1066.
The lettering although true to a type 2 Vulfbehrt seems a bit cheap, like paint in etching, but true in spelling to high carbon steel swords of the time.
The scabbard holds the blade well but every time i use it the blade is drawn having what looks like sawdust on it.
Typical Windlass issues, but for around $200 you really can't expect a top name brand that uses C and C methods and it is something I would use with no hesitation.
May 18, 2018
I have quite a few swords, Albion, Del Tin, Valiant Armory, DSA and more but this is my go to sword for cutting and overall feel. It feels perfectly balanced in my hand and is very comfortable, the pommel never causing issues with my hand or wrist. I have beat this thing and it has never loosened and the edge has never chipped or rolled. It has a good temper and flexes but does not take a set. Other reviewers have said this isn't historically accurate but it is. I have found a picture of an archaeological example that is almost identical, the spelling, shape and overall structure. For the money this is one of the best sword values around. Yes, you could nit pick the details as you can with any Windlass, but functionally it is perfect.
May 18, 2017
Sword is awesome,very happy with everything.sharp sword is very sharp,again very happy
May 14, 2017
I'm very happy with the Windlass Ulfberht sword. Another A+ for the team at MRL.
September 19, 2016
I'd been wanting this sword for a long time, and finally sprang for it. The quality, fit and finish are a steal for the money. I had mine sharpened, and it is a wicked piece of work. The scabbard is sturdy and attractive. The grip is comfortable and does not slip. The pommel is nicely peened and polished, and helps to provide a secure grasp. The cross guard is my only complaint- the channel where the blade passes through could be much smaller. The blade itself is beautifully polished, and holds a razor edge. The weapon is solid and sturdy, with a nice heft to it and a good balance.
August 10, 2016
I love it! It is everything I hoped for.
January 28, 2016
Unique taper and shape at the tip of the blade. Rounded, rather than straight up pointy. The etching on the blade is nicely done and dark. This is not too heavy or poorly balanced, so its easy for me to use one-handed without discomfort. The leather wrapped grip is firm, and feels good in the hand; its not slippery at all. Very happy with this sword, highly recommended.
January 28, 2016
Very nice, just a little less on fit and finish but beautiful and the sharpening service was great.
January 28, 2016
I received my sword yesterday, and I am happy with my sword! It feels wonderful in my hands and looks it too. I think she is a very accurate sword of that era.
January 08, 2016
The sword was a gift for my adult son. He said, "Best.Gift.EVER."
December 28, 2015
Very solid weapon. The counter weight could be a little heavier to balance the blade.
September 27, 2015
I just received it today fast shipping, I'm very happy .
August 14, 2015
It's a slight bit on the heavy side and the crossguard is a bit chunky, but overall I really like this sword. It feels really good in the hand and I like the balance. Where it is having problems is the "+ulfberht+" etching. After just a couple of weeks the part of the etching by the crossguard is starting to rub off from the scabbard. Otherwise, this would easily be a 4-star sword. I will avoid using the scabbard in the future.
The people kvetching about the spelling of "+ulfberht+" are getting bad info from an otherwise pretty good TV documentary. The important feature was the quality of the steel, not the spelling that the illiterate smith used. There are multiple spelling variations and reverse marks for "true" ulfberht swords. The oldest existing genuine example we have is misspelled "+ulfbeht+". For the price, this sword is a good replica of the original, judging by the photos from the Pierce book.
May 30, 2015
If you are hoping for this sword to be 100% historically correct then you will be disappointed but if you hoping for this sword to be well made, then you are in for a treat. The balance is great. The grip, guard and pommel are well put together. As far as the quality of the sword goes, this is a great sword. If you aren't picky about historical accuracy, then this is the sword you will want in your collection. Great sword.
February 07, 2015
I just received this sword. as usual it is very well made and well balanced. Thank you
KJK US Army Colonel (Ret)
December 31, 2014
This is a fine quality sword, nice looking and very pratical. I would not hesitate to buy again. I tested it against tree limbs, mats, and brush. It held up perfectly and held a fine edge.
December 22, 2014
One drawback I can see to an otherwise great sword is that the +ULFBERHT+ spelling of the inlay on historical blades has been found to correlate with lower quality steel blades than the true high carbon, low impurity steel of the blades of real Ulfberhts, which have all been marked +ULFBERH+T. It's hypothesized they were forgeries of lower quality trying to pass themselves off as the top of the line blades, in the same way as many modern knockoffs misspell the brand name.
December 05, 2012