I love it! It is everything I hoped for.
Reviewed by Ty
1/28/2016 11:07:43 AM
Unique taper and shape at the tip of the blade. Rounded, rather than straight up pointy. The etching on the blade is nicely done and dark. This is not too heavy or poorly balanced, so its easy for me to use one-handed without discomfort. The leather wrapped grip is firm, and feels good in the hand; its not slippery at all. Very happy with this sword, highly recommended.
Reviewed by Jeffrey
1/28/2016 12:53:11 AM
Very nice, just a little less on fit and finish but beautiful and the sharpening service was great.
Reviewed by Ken
1/28/2016 12:05:47 AM
I received my sword yesterday, and I am happy with my sword! It feels wonderful in my hands and looks it too. I think she is a very accurate sword of that era.
Reviewed by Michael
1/8/2016 11:17:57 AM
The sword was a gift for my adult son. He said, "Best.Gift.EVER."
Reviewed by Linda
12/28/2015 9:51:15 AM
Very solid weapon. The counter weight could be a little heavier to balance the blade.
Reviewed by Steven
9/27/2015 5:25:26 PM
I just received it today fast shipping, I'm very happy .
Reviewed by Larry
8/14/2015 11:44:14 PM
It's a slight bit on the heavy side and the crossguard is a bit chunky, but overall I really like this sword. It feels really good in the hand and I like the balance. Where it is having problems is the "+ulfberht+" etching. After just a couple of weeks the part of the etching by the crossguard is starting to rub off from the scabbard. Otherwise, this would easily be a 4-star sword. I will avoid using the scabbard in the future.
The people kvetching about the spelling of "+ulfberht+" are getting bad info from an otherwise pretty good TV documentary. The important feature was the quality of the steel, not the spelling that the illiterate smith used. There are multiple spelling variations and reverse marks for "true" ulfberht swords. The oldest existing genuine example we have is misspelled "+ulfbeht+". For the price, this sword is a good replica of the original, judging by the photos from the Pierce book.
Reviewed by Andrew
5/30/2015 11:28:27 PM
If you are hoping for this sword to be 100% historically correct then you will be disappointed but if you hoping for this sword to be well made, then you are in for a treat. The balance is great. The grip, guard and pommel are well put together. As far as the quality of the sword goes, this is a great sword. If you aren't picky about historical accuracy, then this is the sword you will want in your collection. Great sword.
Reviewed by David
2/7/2015 1:29:43 PM
I just received this sword. as usual it is very well made and well balanced. Thank you
KJK US Army Colonel (Ret)
Reviewed by LTC Kenyon
12/31/2014 11:34:37 AM
This is a fine quality sword, nice looking and very pratical. I would not hesitate to buy again. I tested it against tree limbs, mats, and brush. It held up perfectly and held a fine edge.
Reviewed by Ronnie
12/22/2014 12:31:17 PM
One drawback I can see to an otherwise great sword is that the +ULFBERHT+ spelling of the inlay on historical blades has been found to correlate with lower quality steel blades than the true high carbon, low impurity steel of the blades of real Ulfberhts, which have all been marked +ULFBERH+T. It's hypothesized they were forgeries of lower quality trying to pass themselves off as the top of the line blades, in the same way as many modern knockoffs misspell the brand name.
Reviewed by Nathanael
12/5/2012 12:00:00 AM